Florida’s unfair law

Jennifer Mee Case

Florida woman Jennifer Mee was sentenced to life in prison without parole in 2013 after being convicted of first-degree murder. If she believes that she deserved to be locked up for life, she might want to think again once she reads the details of Jennifer’s case, which are:

Jennifer made an appointment with a young man with whom she contacted through Facebook but with the intention of robbing him. Her male companions carried out the assault and it was during this process that the victim was fatally shot. Under Florida law, all participants in a fatal robbery are just as equally guilty of murder as the one who pulled the trigger.

There are aspects of this crime that are wrong, but the main one is that Jennifer is charged with first degree murder.

Why is it wrong?

Here is your answer:

Jennifer never intended to kill the victim nor did she want her to die.

This means that Jennifer is not guilty of murder but manslaughter according to the dictionary.

There are some gruesome murder cases, so how does your case compare to others in Florida?

Jennifer did not actually kill the victim, but received the same sentence as America’s most violent murderers.

There have been other contributing or rather mitigating factors that have been brought up in Jennifer’s defense and one of them is that an ex-boyfriend beat her up and did this and that to her when she was young.

I told Jennifer in my correspondence with her that the people who did these things to her are not responsible for the decisions she made.

She took that on board. (with a little luck)

The case received a lot of public attention due to Jennifer’s notoriety. When she was a teenager, she suffered from an incurable hiccup attack and appeared on national television. All kinds of emotions are stirred up in this and other high-profile cases, but the judge is supposed to be above all of that. It seems that in this case she did not.

Aside from her sentence of life without parole, which is grossly unfair, it’s impossible to see how Jennifer could have received a fair trial with the media circus reporting on this case.

The judge is supposed to rise above all the emotion and hype, but is it possible that the judge in this case didn’t?

I have written to US politicians about all of this and have never received a single response.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *